Honeste Vivere
Full Lenght Article
KONTEKSTUALISASI KONSEP PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA (NOODWEER EXCES) DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN
Abstract
In the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), there is a concept known as a criminal elimination reason, which allows a person who commits an act that would normally be considered a crime to go unpunished. One such reason is the concept of forgiveness, which eliminates the perpetrator's guilt. This means that even though their actions are proven to violate the law, the perpetrator is not punished due to the elimination of their guilt. An example of such a concept is Forced Defense that exceeds the limit (noodweer excesses). This study focuses on the regulation of excessive forced defense (noodweer exces) according to criminal law in Indonesia, as well as the application of this concept in a specific court decision. The research method used is normative legal research, with a case approach, using various legal materials such as legislation, decisions, expert opinions, legal dictionaries, law journals, and encyclopedias. The study's findings indicate that the defendant has fulfilled all the elements of excessive forced defense (noodweer exces) as regulated in Article 49, Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. It was found that the defendant did not intentionally stab the victim with a knife due to being in a state of great shock at the time
Keywords
Declarations
Publisher's Note
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Andre G.Mawey, 2016, Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum, Lex Crimen Vol. V/No. 2/Feb/2016, hlm.83,https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar_url?url=https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/download/11120/10710&hl=id&sa=X&ei=hwmbZevfCrSx6Rqp4Of0A4&scisig=AFWwaea42aymqvSTN_H8PXNFLIjU&oi=scholarr.
E.Y. Kanter dan S.R. Sianturi, 2012, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Storia Grafika.
H. M. Hamdan, 2012, Alasan Penghapus Pidana (Teori dan Studi Kasus), Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
H. Suyanto, 2018, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, cetakan pertama, Yogyakarta.
Jan Remmelink, 2014, Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Mahrus Ali, 2015, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Cetakan. Ketiga, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Nyoman Serikat Pj, R.B. Sularto, M.Rifan F, (2015), Implementasi Alasan Pengahpusan Pidana Karena Daya Paksa dalam Putusan Hakim, Diponegoro Law Review, Vol.4, No.1, hlm.3 ,:https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/19055/implementasi-alasan-penghapus-pidana-karena-daya-paksa-dalam-putusan-hakim#cite,
P.A.F. Lamintang, 1984, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru.
Prodjodikoro, W, 1989, Asas – Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Bandung: Eresco.
Rusli Muhammad, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Roy Roland Tabaluyan, 2015, Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas Menurut Pasal 49 KUHP, Lex Crimen, Vol.IV, No. 6, hlm. 27, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/3328-ID-pembelaan-terpaksa-yang-melampaui-batas-menurut-pasal-49-kuhp.pdf.
Zainal Abidin Farid, 2007, Hukum Pidana I”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Copyright and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
19 September 2024 -
Revised
19 December 2024 -
Accepted
Not available -
Published
26 January 2025