Honeste Vivere
Full Lenght Article
KOMPREHENSIF TENTANG HUKUM PIDANA BALASAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA
Abstract
Retaliatory criminal law is a fundamental paradigm in the criminal justice system that emphasizes appropriate retribution against perpetrators of crimes. This study comprehensively examines the concept of retaliatory criminal law, its implementation in the Indonesian legal system, and its implications. Through a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis, this study reveals that although retaliatory criminal law has strong philosophical legitimacy, its implementation faces various challenges in the context of modern criminal law developments. The New Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) demonstrates a paradigm shift from pure retribution to a neoclassical approach that integrates corrective, restorative, and rehabilitative elements. This study finds that the implementation of supervisory punishment as an alternative to sentencing reflects the evolution of a more humanistic concept of retaliatory criminal law. However, technical challenges in its implementation, especially for law enforcement officials such as prosecutors, require comprehensive supporting regulations. The study's conclusions demonstrate the need to balance the goal of retribution with aspects of victim recovery and perpetrator rehabilitation to achieve more holistic justice.
Keywords
Declarations
Publisher's Note
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Beccaria, C. (1764). On Crimes and Punishments. Livorno: Marco Coltellini.
Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as Property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1-15.
Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1821). Philosophy of Right. Berlin: Nicolai.
Kant, I. (1797). The Metaphysics of Morals. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.
Moore, M. S. (1997). Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saleh, R. (1983). Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek van Strafrecht).
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Artikel dan Sumber Online
HukumOnline. (2024). Jaksa dan Implementasi Pidana Pengawasan di KUHP Baru. Diakses dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/jaksa-dan-implementasi-pidana-pengawasan-di-kuhp-baru-lt65c284ef91efc/
HukumOnline. (2024). Memahami Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam KUHP Baru. Diakses dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/memahami-pertanggungjawaban-pidana-dalam-kuhp-baru-lt65da29d97d621/
Syed Aizaz Ali Syah, Psychological Insights. (2020). Definition of Theories of Punishment || Law || Criminology, terdapat dalam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvRwxw--TDk,
ResearchGate. (2023). Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Perbandingan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dengan Hukum Islam. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375077102_Konsep_Restorative_Justice_Dalam_Perbandingan_Hukum_Pidana_Di_Indonesia_Dengan_Hukum_Islam
Putusan Pengadilan
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 2471 K/Pid/2006.
Copyright and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
23 July 2025 -
Revised
28 July 2025 -
Accepted
Not available -
Published
31 July 2025