This article examines the legal status of labor inspection service standards requested by the East Java Labor Struggle Alliance and the enforceability of the East Java Information Commission Decision No. 27/IV/KI-Prov.Jatim-PS-A/2024. The study uses normative legal research with statutory and case approaches, supported by a conceptual reading of public information law and administrative adjudication. Primary legal materials consist of Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure, Law No. 25 of 2009 on Public Services, relevant Information Commission regulations, Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2011, the disputed service-standard decree, and the Information Commission decision. The analysis finds that a labor inspection service standard is open public information because it governs the delivery of a public service and falls within the category of regulations, decisions, or policies that must remain accessible. An exemption claim must also satisfy the statutory consequence-test mechanism, which was not substantiated in this dispute. The second finding concerns enforcement. The Information Commission has adjudicative authority and its final decisions are legally binding, but the Commission has no independent coercive apparatus comparable to a court bailiff. When a state public body does not voluntarily comply, enforcement must proceed through the State Administrative Court under Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2011. The case therefore shows that the principal weakness lies not in the normative status of the requested information, but in the layered pathway required to convert a final disclosure order into effective administrative compliance.